The origin of this phenomenon is due to the vanishing in two dimensions
of the so called ``vortex stretching term''
that appears as a
forcing term in the evolution equation for vorticity in the
three-dimensional case where it is responsible for the unbounded
growth of enstrophy in the limit
.
In the inviscid limit and in absence of
external forcing and friction, the vorticity equations
simply states that the derivative of the vorticity
along the fluid trajectories vanishes
In two dimension the enstrophy is bounded by
the energy balance equation, which is obtained from Eq. (1.60)
in absence of external forcing and friction
,
and assuming periodic boundary conditions:
Therefore, at variance with the three-dimensional case,
in two-dimensional turbulence the viscous dissipation
of energy vanishes in the limit
Since the viscous energy dissipation vanishes it the limit
, in fully developed two-dimensional turbulence it is
impossible to have a cascade of energy with constant flux toward
small scales.
Moreover, the presence of two quadratic inviscid invariant,
the energy and the enstrophy, modifies the picture of
the turbulent cascade.
Dividing the wavenumber space into shells of modulus
the triad interactions between wavenumbers which produce the energy cascade
in three dimensions can be thought of as pair interactions between the
-th shell and the
-th one. This is inadmissible in two dimensions
because pair interaction between two neighbor shells cannot
transfer both energy and enstrophy conservatively between equal wave-numbers.
In order for both energy and vorticity to be conserved the
net transfer by each triad interaction must be out of the middle
wavenumber into both smallest and largest wave-numbers.